Evidence Hub

Prevalence of opportunistic fungal infections (candidiasis and cryptococcal meningitis) among HIV-positive individuals in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA compliant)

Aemiro A, Girma A, Girma A, Setew S, Menelih A

Medicine, 2026

8,482 participants

Abstract

Background: Individuals with compromised immune systems, particularly those living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), face an elevated risk of opportunistic fungal infections (OFIs), including candidiasis and cryptococcal meningitis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of OFIs among HIV-positive individuals across different regions of Ethiopia.

Methods: English-language articles were identified through a comprehensive search of online databases, including ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for prevalence studies was used to assess study quality. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using inverse variance (I2 statistic), sensitivity analysis, funnel plots, and Egger's regression test. Due to significant heterogeneity, a random-effects model was employed to estimate the pooled prevalence of OFIs among HIV-positive individuals. Data analysis was conducted using STATA version 14. This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines, and the protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024620835).

Results: From 254 initially identified articles, 19 studies on Candida (8482 participants) and 9 studies on Cryptococcus (4017 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of candidiasis was 13.46% (95% confidence interval:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 8,482 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free