Evidence Hub

Understanding Orthorexia Nervosa: A Systematic Review of Meta-analytical Findings

Moccia L, Anesini MB, Callovini T, Janiri D, Policola C, Cintoni M, Focà F, Kotzalidis GD et al.

Current nutrition reports, 2025

5 citations

Abstract

Orthorexia Nervosa (ON) is an emerging condition marked by an obsessive focus on healthy eating, often resulting in impairments in well-being, daily functioning, and quality of life. Despite growing awareness, ON is not currently recognized in major psychiatric diagnostic systems, complicating its identification and clinical management.

Objective: This umbrella review aims to synthesize evidence from existing meta-analyses on the prevalence and associated factors of ON, while critically assessing the quality of the current literature.

Methods: A comprehensive review of five meta-analyses was conducted, focusing on ON prevalence rates, its psychological correlates, and the quality of the included studies. The review also evaluated heterogeneity in findings and the reliability of assessment tools used across studies.

Results: Prevalence estimates of ON showed wide variability due to differences in populations and assessment instruments. ON was significantly associated with compulsive exercise, eating disorder symptoms, obsessive-compulsive traits, and perfectionism. Newer diagnostic tools reveal a stronger connection between ON and obsessive-compulsive tendencies, while distinguishing it from traditional eating disorders, due to its focus on food purity rather than weight control. Methodological limitations, such as inconsistent assessment tools and variable study designs, limit the conclusiveness of current evidence, rendering most findings suggestive rather than definitive.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free