Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Child and Adolescent Healthcare Utilization for Eating Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Sheri Madigan, Tracy Vaillancourt, G. Dimitropoulos, Shainur Premji, Selena M. Kahlert, Katie Zumwalt, D. Korczak, K. V. von Ranson et al.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2024

44 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Conduct a meta-analysis documenting healthcare service utilization rates for pediatric (<19 years) eating disorders (EDs) during compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHOD

PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection were search for studies published up to May 19, 2023. Studies with pediatric visits to primary care, inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department for EDs before and during the pandemic were included. This preregistered review (PROSPERO CRD42023413392) reported using PRISMA guidelines. Data were analyzed with random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

52 studies reporting >148,000 child and adolescent eating disorder-related visits to >300 health settings across 15 countries were included (mean age 12.7 [SD 4.1] years; 87% girls). There was strong evidence of an increase in healthcare utilization for EDs during the pandemic (rate ratio [RR] 1.54, 95%CI 1.38-1.71). Moderator analysis revealed larger rate increases among girls (RR 1.48, 95%CI 1.28-1.71) compared to boys (RR 1.24, 95%CI 1.06-1.45) and adolescents (≥12 to 19 years) (RR 1.53, 95%CI 1.29-1.81) compared to children (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.53-1.43). Moderator analysis demonstrated strong evidence of increased utilization of emergency department (RR 1.70, 95%CI 1.48-1.97), inpatient (RR 1.56, 95%CI 1.33-1.84), and outpatient services (RR 1.62, 95%CI 1.35-1.95), as well as strong evidence of increased rates of anorexia nervosa (RR 1.48, 95%CI 1.24-1.75).

CONCLUSION

Healthcare…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free