Evidence Hub

A transdiagnostic and diagnostic-specific approach on inflammatory biomarkers in eating disorders: A meta-analysis and systematic review

C. Dani, Livio Tarchi, E. Cassioli, E. Rossi, G. P. Merola, Arianna Ficola, V. Cordasco, V. Ricca et al.

Psychiatry Research, 2024

20 citations

Abstract

Eating disorders (EDs) are severe mental illnesses with a multifactorial etiology and a chronic course. Among the biological factors related to pathogenesis and maintenance of EDs, inflammation acquired growing scientific interest. This study aimed to assess the inflammatory profile of EDs, focusing on anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and including for the first time binge eating disorder. A comprehensive research of existing literature identified 51 eligible studies for meta-analysis, comparing levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), osteoprotegerin (OPG), soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (sRANKL), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) between patients with EDs and healthy controls (HCs). The systematic review explored other inflammatory biomarkers of interest, which did not meet the meta-analysis criteria. Results revealed significantly elevated levels of TNF-α, OPG, sRANKL, and IL-1β in patients with EDs compared to HCs. Additionally, the results highlighted the heterogeneity of inflammatory state among patients with EDs, emphasizing the need for further research into the association between inflammatory biomarkers and psychopathological correlates. This approach should transcend categorical diagnoses, enabling more precise subcategorizations of patients. Overall, this study contributed to the understanding of the inflammatory pathways involved in EDs, emphasizing potential…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free