Evidence Hub

Association between eating disorders and functional gastrointestinal disorders: a systematic review

Alsaud AS, Aldoweesh OH, Aljurayyed SM, Alharbi FB, Alaqeel SA, Alkhuwaildy HS, Alsadoun FS, Aloufi FS et al.

Frontiers in psychology, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) and eating disorders (EDs) frequently coexist with one another. It is not unusual for a patient to present with both diseases because they share many similarities with reference to the deeper psychological factors and the connection between the gastrointestinal tract and the brain. Many studies have shown that while the occurrence of FGID in eating disorder patients is noteworthy, it varies greatly, mostly due to disparate research approaches. This review aims to synthesize 2015-2025 evidence on ED-FGID associations, prevalence patterns, bidirectionality, shared psychological mechanisms, and implications for screening and multidisciplinary management.

Methods: In line with the PRISMA statement, this systematic review retrieved English-language research published within the period of 2015-2025 using a range of databases for studies related to the relationship between EDs and FGIDs. The quality of the observational studies with eligibility criteria met for data retrieval has been appraised using National Institutes of Health standards. The data has been narratively reported instead of meta-analyzed.

Results: The criteria are met in nine studies published between 2016 and 2025. The studies include both the cross-sectional type and the cohort type. The overall quality of the studies leans towards being sound. The trend indicates that the co-occurrence between EDs and FGIDs is prominent, with irritable bowel syndrome…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free