Evidence Hub

Psychological variables of crossFit participants: an up-to-date systematic review

de Oliveira HS, Dominski FH, Truppel R, D'Oliveira A, Andrade A

Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: CrossFit® presents a relevant context for investigating psychological variables due to its characteristics, including high-intensity training, a competitive environment, strong social interaction, and a focus on performance and overcoming physical and mental limits. This systematic review aimed to broaden understanding of the psychological variables of CrossFit participants by identifying findings, methodologies, and existing research gaps.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251120994). Searches were performed in SCOPUS, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The methodological quality of the included cross-sectional studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist.

Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, most of which employed a cross-sectional design. Exercise dependence was the most frequently investigated variable, with prevalence rates ranging from 14.4% to 25.2%. Intrinsic and self-determined motivation predominated among participants and were strongly associated with passion for the sport. Evidence also suggested positive effects on well-being and emotional self-efficacy. Conversely, competitive settings were associated with increased anxiety levels and negative mood changes. Preference and tolerance for high-intensity exercise were positively related to social support.

Conclusion: The…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free