Evidence Hub

Artists and eating disorders: what do we know? A systematic review of the evidence and gaps

Bui E, Negash MJ, Burnham G, Liew JX, Phuong NT, Krug I

Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2026

Abstract

Objectives: Although artists are often considered at higher risk for eating disorders (EDs), evidence remains limited. We therefore conducted a systematic review of ED occurrence, risk, body image concerns, and general psychopathology in artistic populations.

Method: Following PRISMA guidelines, PsycINFO, Medline, and Web of Science were searched for English-language studies published in any year. Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria and were narratively synthesised.

Results: The review encompassed a broad range of artistic groups (e.g., musicians, actors, circus and drag performers, and theatre artists). Four studies reported lifetime ED diagnoses (2.9% to 22.5%; mean ≈ 12.1%), while three studies assessed current ED diagnoses (1.4% to 18.7%; mean ≈ 7.5%). Six studies reported ED risk levels, which varied substantially (8% to 70.7%; mean ≈ 27.8%), reflecting considerable heterogeneity in samples and methodologies. Importantly, these estimates were largely derived from self-report or non-standardised assessments rather than validated structured clinical interviews, limiting their interpretability and comparability. Despite these limitations, most studies indicated elevated ED-related indicators and body dissatisfaction in artistic populations relative to general population benchmarks, although such comparisons should be interpreted with caution. Across studies, body image concerns were consistently associated with ED symptoms, and anxiety and depression were positively…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free