Evidence Hub

Management of status epilepticus in the emergency department: Systematic review and clinical update

Alonso Avilés R, Fernández Alonso C, González Martínez F, Liñán López M, Grupo de Trabajo de NeuroSEMES

Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias, 2026

664 participants

Abstract

Objective: To update the available evidence on the management of all types of status epilepticus (SE) in hospital emergency departments (EDs) and prehospital emergency medical services (EMS).

Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 methodology. A comprehensive search was conducted across biomedical databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Spanish databases) from January 2015 through October 2025. Studies on treatment, validated prognostic scales, and multicenter registries of convulsive and nonconvulsive SE were included. Quality assessment was performed using GRADE and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results: A total of 47 studies were included. Benzodiazepines remain the first-line therapy (high certainty of evidence, GRADE). As second-line therapy, levetiracetam, phenytoin, and valproate showed comparable efficacy (50-60%; moderate certainty). The ESETT trial demonstrated no superiority among second-line antiseizure drugs. Spanish evidence includes the ACESUR Registry (664 patients) and the validated RACESUR (AUC 0.72) and ADAN scales (predictive accuracy 90.9%; 95% CI, 88.4-93.4), providing context-specific evidence for the Spanish healthcare system.

Conclusions: SE management requires rapid sequential treatment with benzodiazepines followed by second-line antiseizure drugs. Comparable efficacy among second-line options allows individualized treatment. The Spanish RACESUR and ADAN scales are validated tools that facilitate risk…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 664 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free