Evidence Hub

Existing Trainings and Deficiencies in the Education of Dietitians about Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review

Brien M., Plouffe M., Gagnon-Girouard M.-P.

Canadian journal of dietetic practice and research : a publication of Dietitians of Canada = Revue canadienne de la pratique et de la recherche en dietetique : une publication des Dietetistes du Canada, 2026

Abstract

Dietitians' lack of knowledge about eating disorders (EDs) can hinder access to nutritional care and present iatrogenic risks for people with EDs. This systematic review described existing trainings and deficiencies in the dietitians' education about EDs. It was carried out following the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 10 databases were systematically searched for quantitative and qualitative literature and 11 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. The included studies outlined that the current formal education opportunities for dietitians about EDs are insufficient. Education about EDs was associated with better clinical skills and self-efficacy in the field of EDs. A lack of knowledge about EDs was identified as a cause of unwillingness to work with people with EDs. Specific knowledge relative to EDs underlined as deficient included gastro-intestinal disturbances, mental comorbidities and the treatments available. The development of formal education for dietitians about EDs addressing their gastro-intestinal and mental aspects is advised. If effective, it could improve the dietitians' educational opportunities about EDs and increase their willingness to care for this clientele.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free