Evidence Hub

Beyond behavior: neural and cognitive alterations in eating disorders-a systematic review

Panarello E, Monaco F, Vignapiano A, Di Gruttola B, Landi S, Ferrara E, Malvone R, Palermo S et al.

Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eating disorders (EDs), particularly Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and Bulimia Nervosa (BN), are complex psychiatric conditions marked by alterations in cognition, emotional regulation, and interoception. Accumulating evidence suggests that these behavioral features are underpinned by structural and functional brain abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to synthesize recent neuroimaging findings, particularly resting-state functional MRI and functional connectivity studies on cognitive and neural alterations in eating disorders (EDs).

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42025648023), we systematically searched PubMed and APA PsycINFO for studies published between 2014 and 2024. Twelve studies met inclusion criteria and were assessed for quality and risk of bias using GRADE, RoB 2.0, and ROBINS-I tools. The included studies investigated both adolescent and adult populations, allowing consideration of developmental and illness stage-related aspects.

RESULTS

Altered brain activity and connectivity patterns were consistently reported in individuals with AN and BN, particularly in the cortico-striatal-thalamic system (CSTS), default mode network (DMN), and interhemispheric circuits. Cognitive flexibility deficits were associated with abnormal neural activation despite preserved behavioral performance, suggesting compensatory mechanisms. Insular dysfunction persisted after weight restoration, and altered responses to reward and social cues were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free