Evidence Hub

Mapping the relationships among sleep, motor balance, and cognition in older adults: a systematic scoping review

Shin YC, Shah S, Sejpal HM, Wang H

Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025

67,237 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Sleep, motor balance, and cognitive function are critical for maintaining functional independence in older adults, yet their interrelationships remain poorly understood. This systematic scoping review maps the evidence on pairwise and triadic relationships among these domains in older adults.

Methods: Following the JBI Manual for scoping reviews, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase for studies (January 1, 2004-March 1, 2024) involving older adults (≥60 years) that examined sleep, motor balance, and cognition. Covidence facilitated a two-phase screening, selecting studies assessing all three domains. Data on study design, participant characteristics, and outcome measures were extracted, with evidence levels assessed using NHMRC guidelines.

Results: From 1,367 studies, 33 (7 experimental, 26 observational) involving 67,237 older adults were included. Sleep quality showed weak to moderate positive associations with motor balance (e.g., r = 0.1-0.3) and cognition, while motor balance confidence was positively linked to cognition. Only one study explored triadic interactions, revealing a significant gap. Effect sizes suggest limited clinical significance in some findings.

Conclusion: Pairwise relationships among sleep, motor balance, and cognition are evident but weak. Longitudinal, multimodal intervention studies are needed to explore triadic interactions and inform integrated interventions.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 67,237 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free