Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor in Patients Using Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Hasabo EA, Isik B, Elgadi A, Eljack MMF, Yacoub MS, Elzomor H, Sultan S, Caliskan K et al.

Journal of clinical medicine, 2024

228 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) have been shown to reduce risks of clinical events in patients with heart failure (HF). However, data on the use of SGLT2-i in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are scarce. We thought to assess the efficacy and safety of SGLT2-i in patients with LVADs. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane from inception to November 2024. We used all relevant words for "SGLT2-i" and "LVAD" to search in databases, and we included studies and published abstracts in peer-reviewed journals of studies that assessed SGLT2-i in patients with LVAD. Results: Four studies and seven abstracts totaling 228 patients using SGLT2-i were included. Empagliflozin, Dapagliflozin, and Canagliflozin were the used SGLT2-i across the included studies. Pooled analysis showed that SGLT2-i significantly improved ejection fraction (EF) (Mean= 4.2, 95% CI [1.22, 7.19]) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (Mean = -0.44, 95% CI [-0.79, -0.09]) from baseline. However, no significant changes in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were noticed. Other outcomes of interest not included in the meta-analysis did not show significant changes, such as cardiac index (CI), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), mean arterial pressure (MAP), or mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP). The pooled percentage of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 228 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free