Evidence Hub

Outcome parameters in studies investigating dry eye disease: A systematic literature review

Pai V, Schmidl D, Petric L, Janku P, Lindner T, Graf U, Chua J, Schmetterer L et al.

Acta ophthalmologica, 2026

Abstract

The development of effective therapeutics for dry eye disease (DED) is challenging due to its complex pathophysiology, heterogeneous patient presentation and the significant failure rate of previous clinical development programs. This underlines the importance of the selection of appropriate endpoints for clinical trials. The presented systematic review retrospectively analyzes the endpoints used in controlled clinical trials in studies of DED. Published clinical trials in the field of DED were reviewed from 2000 to 2023 and the used clinical endpoints were recorded by type and frequency of use. All studies that met the primary keyword search across various databases (PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Medline) were imported into Rayyan which was used to facilitate the screening process and support the collaboration between the reviewers. 93 876 studies were found of which 33 908 remained after duplicates were removed. All abstracts were screened for eligibility independently by two reviewers. 355 articles remained for full-text review, of which 194 were included in the present systematic review. The most frequently investigated product was topical medicinal products (88 studies), followed by topical lubricants (57 studies) and nutritional supplements (22 studies). Corneal fluorescein staining (45 studies) and the ocular surface disease index (OSDI; 96 studies) were the most frequently used primary objective and subjective outcome parameters. However, a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free