Evidence Hub

Advancing dementia-friendly hospital care: a systematic review of healthcare professionals' reported barriers and facilitators using the theoretical domains framework

Shimelash M, Fu J, Plantinga A, Geelen SJG, Hofman C, Claassen JAHR, van Munster BC

Age and ageing, 2026

Abstract

Background: People living with dementia are common in hospitals and often experience poorer outcomes, yet dementia-friendly hospital care (DFHC) is not consistently embedded in routine practice. A theory-informed synthesis of healthcare professionals' reported barriers and facilitators is needed to guide implementation.

Objectives: To synthesise healthcare professionals' reported barriers and facilitators to DFHC using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMBASE were searched, with citation tracking. Eligible studies reported staff-reported barriers and/or facilitators relevant to DFHC in hospital settings. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted and appraised studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Determinants were classified as barriers or facilitators and mapped to TDF domains; recurrent cross-domain bundles were identified inductively. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251085854).

Results: Sixty-five studies were included. Methodological quality was generally high. We coded 856 determinants: 455 barriers and 401 facilitators. Barriers were most commonly mapped to Environmental Context and Resources (14.1%), Knowledge (12.5%) and Social Influences (11.0%). Facilitators clustered mainly in Social Influences (15.2%), Environmental Context and Resources (15.0%), and Knowledge (14.2%). Recurrent barrier bundles…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free