Evidence Hub

Barriers and Facilitators in Implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines Among Nurses in Emergency Departments and Critical Care Units: A Systematic Review

Mona Alrashdi, Barry Quinn, S. Clarke

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2025

9 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim This systematic review explored the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) among nurses in emergency departments (EDs) and critical care units (CCUs). Design Systematic review. Method A systematic review was performed using both qualitative and quantitative studies from five databases (CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and PubMed). The literature search was conducted in May 2024. The PRISMA framework was used to guide the review process. Findings were subject to a narrative, thematic analysis and critical appraisal. Results Eighteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria, yielding three themes related to barriers and facilitators of guideline implementation: individual‐level, guideline‐level and organisational‐level. Key barriers included lack of awareness of guidelines, lack of knowledge and skills, attitudes towards guidelines, resource limitations, lack of perceived support, complexity of guidelines and lack of training. Facilitators to guideline use included colleague support, adequate training, effective leadership and refinement of guidelines to ensure relevance, local adaptation and user‐friendly content. Discussion Numerous barriers to nurse implementation of CPGs exist in ED and CCU settings, reflecting a complex interplay of individual, CPG‐related and organisational factors. To facilitate CPG implementation, it is important for staff to be educated and trained in their use,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free