Evidence Hub

The Role of Telemedicine in Emergency Department Triage and Patient Care: A Systematic Review

Anas A. Ahmed, Mohammed E. Mojiri, Ali Daghriri, Ohoud Hakami, R. Alruwaili, Rayan A Khan, Hassan A. Madkhali, Manar M. Almania et al.

Cureus, 2024

15 citations

Abstract

Overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) is a global challenge, leading to prolonged waiting times and adverse patient outcomes. Telemedicine has emerged as a promising solution, enabling remote consultation, triage, and real-time specialist input. Despite its growing application, limited systematic research exists on its specific role in ED triage and care. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions in ED settings, focusing on diagnostic accuracy, patient satisfaction, throughput times, and re-admission rates. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was conducted up to November 10, 2024. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English that assessed telemedicine in ED settings. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the modified Downs and Black scale. Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Results showed that telemedicine improved diagnostic accuracy, reduced re-consultation rates, and enhanced treatment adherence. High diagnostic concordance with in-person assessments was observed, particularly in non-critical cases. Several studies reported shorter throughput times and higher patient satisfaction with telemedicine compared to traditional care. However,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free