Evidence Hub

Initiation of buprenorphine in the emergency department or emergency out-of-hospital setting: A mixed-methods systematic review

Richard Armour, Suzanne Nielsen, Jane A. Buxton, Jennifer L. Bolster, Ming-Xuan Han, Linda Ross

American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2024

851 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

People who use substances increasingly access healthcare primarily through emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency departments (EDs). To meet the needs of these patients, EMS and EDs have become access points for medications for opioid use disorder (OUD), specifically buprenorphine. This systematic review aimed to quantify the efficacy of these programs, examining retention in treatment for OUD, rates of re-presentation to ED or EMS, and rates of precipitated withdrawal, as well as summarise clinician and patient perspectives on buprenorphine initiation in these settings.

METHODS

This review considered studies including patients with OUD receiving, and providers initiating, buprenorphine in an ED or EMS setting. A convergent, segregated approach to mixed-methods review was used as recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. A search was conducted of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Where relevant, meta-analyses of odds ratios and proportions were conducted.

FINDINGS

In both randomised (OR 5.97, 95 %CI 2.52-14.14, 227 participants, I2 16.93 %) and observational (OR 4.28, 95 %CI 2.45-7.48, 779 participants, I2 66.97 %) research, buprenorphine in the ED or EMS setting was associated with increased odds of treatment engagement at 30 days. Rates of retention in treatment varied across measured time points, from 77 % (95 %CI 74-80 %, 763 participants, I2 0.01 %) within 24 h, to 35 % (95 %CI 29-40 %) at 12 months. A low rate of precipitated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 851 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free