Evidence Hub

A proof-of-concept study of pitolisant for excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome

Revana A, Bhattacharjee R, Miller JL, Chidekel A, Khanna P, Ratnam S, Runyan G, Bauer E et al.

Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2025

65 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The majority of patients with Prader-Willi syndrome experience excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). This study evaluated the effects of pitolisant, a histamine 3 (H3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist that promotes wakefulness, in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome and EDS.

METHODS: In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study, patients ages 6-65 years with a confirmed diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome with EDS were randomized 1:1:1 to receive lower-dose pitolisant (children/adolescents/adults, 8.9/13.35/17.8 mg), higher-dose pitolisant (children/adolescents/adults, 17.8/26.7/35.6 mg), or matching placebo for 11 weeks (3-week titration/8-week maintenance). The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 11 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale for Children and Adolescents (parent/caregiver version) score. Other measures included the Caregiver Global Impression of Severity for EDS, Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community, second edition, and Hyperphagia Questionnaire for Clinical Trials.

RESULTS: Of 65 patients randomized and treated, 59 (90.8%) completed the double-blind phase. Least-squares (LS) mean improvement from baseline to week 11 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale for Children and Adolescents score was greater for higher-dose pitolisant (-5.0) vs placebo (-3.9; LS mean [standard error] difference, -1.1 [1.52]), but not for lower-dose pitolisant (-3.5) vs placebo (LS mean [standard error] difference, 0.5 [1.6]). The…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 65 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free