Evidence Hub

Mirror exposure in adolescents with anorexia nervosa: a feasibility study on body image disturbance and attentional bias

Pelzer M, Werthmann J, Svaldi J, Fleischhaker C, Haack-Dees B, Renner F, Tuschen-Caffier B

Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2026

13 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Body image disturbances (BID) are central to anorexia nervosa (AN), influencing its development, maintenance and relapse. While mirror exposure (ME) has been shown to reduce BID in adults, research in adolescents is limited. This pilot randomized controlled trial examined the feasibility and effects of ME, added to treatment as usual (TAU), in adolescent inpatients with AN. In addition, we explored changes in body-related attentional bias as a potential mechanism of change.

Methods: Adolescent female inpatients with AN were randomized to receive either 12 ME sessions over 4 weeks (ME group, n = 11) or TAU (n = 13) in a pre-post design. Primary outcomes were global measures of BID and eating disorder (ED) pathology. Attentional bias was assessed using two eye-tracking paradigms.

Results: Relative to TAU, ME did not improve BID or ED pathology. Both groups showed reductions in BID over time. Exploratory post-hoc analyses indicated reductions in body control and avoidance behaviors in the ME but not the TAU group. An attentional bias toward self-defined unattractive body parts was present but did not change over time in either group.

Discussion: In this pilot trial, ME did not provide additional benefits over TAU in improving global BID or ED pathology in adolescent inpatients with AN. Improvements in BID may reflect general therapeutic effects of inpatient treatment. Exploratory analyses indicated potential effects on specific body-related behaviors but require…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free