Evidence Hub

Epidemiology of Children and Young People Presenting to Australian Emergency Departments for the Management of Acute Severe Behavioural Disturbance: Secondary Analysis of a Randomised Controlled Trial

Bourke EM, Klein K, Selman CJ, Lee KJ, Kochar A, Shellshear D, Borland ML, George S et al.

Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2026

348 participants

Abstract

Aim: To describe the epidemiological characteristics of children and young people presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute severe behavioural disturbance (ASBD) who were deemed to require oral sedative medication.

Methods: Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled open-label multi-centre trial of oral olanzapine versus oral diazepam for the management of ASBD in children and young people aged nine to 17 years for whom epidemiological data were recorded.

Results: There were 348 participants enrolled in the randomised controlled trial (RCT). The majority were female (215/348, 62%) with a mean age of 14.6 years (standard deviation 2.2). The most common pre-existing medical or mental health condition was anxiety (122/299, 35%) followed by attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (33% and 32%, respectively). Two-thirds of the study population (216/348, 62%) had previously attended the ED for ASBD management and 61% (212/348) reported previous intentional self-harm. Nearly three-quarters (247/348, 71%) were accessing psychiatric care in the community prior to their ED presentation. Half of the study population (178/348, 52%) presented to the ED with emergency services (e.g., ambulance, police). The median length of stay in the ED was 5.7 h (interquartile range 3.9-10.2 h) and 28% (98/348) of study participants required admission to hospital.

Conclusions: For children and young people presenting to the ED with ASBD who were deemed to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 348 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free