Evidence Hub

Rocuronium dose and first-attempt intubation success in the critically ill: secondary analysis of two multicenter trials

April MD, Butler H, Demasi SC, Aggarwal NR, Andrea LJ, Barker AB, Barnes CR, Brainard JC et al.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2026

2,440 participants

Abstract

Rationale: The neuromuscular blockade dose may affect intubation success on the first attempt, thereby impacting outcomes for patients undergoing emergency tracheal intubation.

Objectives: To evaluate the association between rocuronium dose and tracheal intubation outcomes among adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from two multicenter randomized controlled trials studying airway management in the ED and ICU. We compared patient characteristics and intubation outcomes between patients receiving high-dose (>1.2 mg/kg) versus standard-dose (≤1.2 mg/kg) rocuronium. The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt. We used propensity matching to account for measured potential confounders, stratified by setting.

Measurements and main results: Participating sites included 9 EDs and 24 ICUs in the United States. Among 2440 patients in the trial datasets, we included the 1822 (74.7%) patients who received rocuronium in the current analysis. Of these, 720 (39.5%) received high-dose rocuronium, and 1102 (60.5%) received standard-dose rocuronium. Participants receiving high-dose rocuronium had a higher probability of successful intubation on the first attempt (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.12). This difference in the primary outcome was not present for ED intubations (adjusted RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.04)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,440 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free