Evidence Hub

Effect of a point-of-care ultrasound-driven diagnostic pathway on diagnostic certainty in emergency department patients with dyspnea: a randomized controlled substudy

Ovesen SH, Skaarup SH, Aagaard R, Løfgren B, Posth S, Arvig MD, Laursen CB, Kirkegaard H et al.

European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, 2026

674 participants

Abstract

Background and importance: In emergency department (ED) patients with dyspnea, diagnostic uncertainty has been linked to poorer outcomes. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may help reduce this uncertainty.

Objective: To explore how POCUS influences ED physicians' diagnostic thinking and perceived uncertainty.

Design, settings, and participants: This preplanned substudy of a randomized controlled trial across 10 Danish EDs compared diagnostic pathways with vs. without focused lung and cardiac ultrasound.

Outcomes measure and analysis: Paired physician surveys and electronic health record data were used to evaluate predefined outcomes: (a) physicians' experienced benefit of diagnostic tests; (b) the number of differential diagnoses; (c) posttest probability estimates; (d) concurrent treatment; and (e) concordance between tentative diagnoses. The primary outcome of the parent trial was discharge alive within 24 h; this substudy focused on early diagnostic reasoning and certainty.

Main results: Between 25 January 2023 and 23 August 2024, 40 physicians enrolled 674 patients. The median number of differential diagnoses was similar between groups [intervention: 3 (interquartile range - IQR: 2-4); control: 3 (IQR: 2-4)]. The proportion of patients with a reduced differential count was 65.3 vs. 72.9% [risk difference: -7.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): -14.9 to -0.3]. The median estimated probability of the leading diagnosis was higher with POCUS (80 vs. 73%). Concordance between…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 674 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free