Evidence Hub

Financial incentives for maintaining postpartum smoking abstinence: 3-4-year follow-up of the Financial Incentives for Prevention of Postpartum Return to Smoking (FIPPS) randomised controlled trial

Ussher M, Best C, Lewis S, Bauld L, McKell J, Orton S, Cooper S, Coleman T

Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026

462 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background and aims: We followed up a financial incentives trial aimed at maintaining smoking cessation postpartum, which showed some positive effects at one year, to assess sustained abstinence at 3-4 years postpartum.

Design, setting and participants: Secondary analysis of longer-term outcomes of a pragmatic, multi-centre, three-arm randomized controlled trial, recruiting 462 postpartum women in England, aged ≥16 years, having stopped smoking during pregnancy with financial incentives, validated as abstinent at end of pregnancy or early postpartum.

Interventions: (1) usual care (UC); (2) UC plus up to £60 of voucher incentives offered to participants and £60 offered to significant-other supporters, over 3 months postpartum, contingent upon validated abstinence ('3-months incentives'); or (3) UC plus '3-months incentives' plus £180 of vouchers offered to participants over 9 months postpartum (leading to a maximum of £240 of incentives for participants, plus £60 for significant others), contingent upon validated abstinence ('12-months incentives'). Participants who did not achieve sustained abstinence at one year were included as non-abstainers but were not followed-up.

Measurements: Primary outcome: biochemically validated abstinence at 3-4 years postpartum. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.017 to account for multiple comparisons.

Findings: Among the full trial sample, 63% (289/462) of participants had self-reported smoking status at 3-4 years postpartum; 19%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 462 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free