Evidence Hub

Factors Associated With Perfluorohexyloctane Treatment Response in Dry Eye Disease Associated With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Gu H, Li Z, Zhu L

Cornea, 2026

156 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Purpose: To explore critical factors associated with perfluorohexyloctane eye drop (SHR8058) treatment response in patients with dry eye disease associated with meibomian gland dysfunction.

Methods: The post hoc analysis was performed from a phase 3, randomized controlled trial (NCT05515471). Treatment response was defined as achieving 1) a ≥ 3-point reduction from baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS response), 2) a ≥30% reduction from baseline in eye dryness score (EDS response), or 3) both tCFS and eye dryness score (EDS) responses (tCFS&EDS response) at day 57. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses using stepwise selection were conducted. Optimal cutoff values were also investigated.

Results: Among the 156 patients treated with SHR8058, 114 achieved a tCFS response, 127 achieved an EDS response, and 98 achieved a tCFS&EDS response. Multivariate analysis revealed tCFS score was associated with tCFS, EDS, and tCFS&EDS responses, with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.37 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-1.73], 1.36 (95% CI, 1.05-1.77), and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.13-1.72), respectively. Ametropia was associated with tCFS and tCFS&EDS responses, with ORs of 3.03 (95% CI, 1.27-7.25) and 2.32 (95% CI, 1.10-4.88), respectively. Moreover, patients with baseline a tCFS score ≥6 were more likely to achieve a tCFS&EDS response compared with those with a tCFS score <6 [OR 3.25 (95% CI, 1.62-6.53)].

Conclusions: Baseline tCFS score and ametropia are critical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 156 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free