Evidence Hub

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation to treat narcolepsy type 1 (TARGET-NT1): A two-arm, randomised, sham-controlled trial

Pan Y, Zhang Y, Xu Z, Wei Z, Pan R, Hu G, Wang X, Yang L et al.

Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025

60 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

To assess exploratorily the safety and efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) as an adjunctive therapy in improving symptoms in patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). The TARGET-NT1 trial, a two-arm, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial was conducted from April 2022, to June 2024 ​at Xijing Hospital in Xi'an, China. Participants were randomised to receive tVNS treatment or sham tVNS (stVNS) treatment. Both interventions were performed for two 30-min periods per day with the same stimulation parameters but different stimulation points, for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in mean sleep onset latency of maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes included changes in Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14), 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17). Among 60 randomised participants (32 men [53.3 ​%] and 28 [46.7 ​%]; mean [SD] age, 29.9 [9.9] years), 56 were included in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. From baseline to week 12, the difference in mean change in mean sleep onset latency of MWT was 3.09 (95 ​% CI, 1.00, 5.88; P ​= ​0.0041) as compared with stVNS group. Significant improvements in NSS-EDS (-2.61 [95%CI, -4.07, -1.15; P ​= ​0.0006]), NSS-SP (-1.11 [95%CI, -1.83, -0.38; P ​= ​0.0030]), NSS-HH (-2.71 [95%CI, -3.36, -2.05; P ​< ​0.0001]), NSS- DNS (-0.52 [95%CI, -0.87, -0.17; P ​= ​0.0036]),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free