Evidence Hub

Improving Delirium Screening and Detection in the Emergency Department (ED): The Implementation and Evaluation of the ED Delirium Detection Program

Sinvani L, Perrin A, Huebschmann AG, Basile M, Groton S, Barnaby D, Sanchez G, Chiuzan C et al.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2026

195 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Delirium is missed in over 75% of older adults presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). The study aimed to determine the efficacy of the ED Delirium Detection Program (ED-DDP) to improve delirium detection while evaluating implementation outcomes.

Methods: The ED-DDP consisted of a train-the-trainer model where delirium champions (DCs) trained ED nurses to perform delirium screening using an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded Brief Confusion Assessment Method (bCAM). The ED-DDP was implemented across 3 diverse EDs using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, consisting of control, implementation, and intervention periods. The RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework guided outcome assessments. Efficacy was defined as delirium detection between control and intervention periods. Implementation outcomes were assessed via quantitative (surveys, training logs, EHR) and qualitative (semi-structured interviews) methods.

Results: Across the 3 ED sites, 94.4% (n = 17/18) of DCs completed delirium training and 94.4% scored ≥ 80% on the post-workshop assessment (Implementation/Fidelity). Over 90% (91.1%, n = 195/214) of nurses agreed to receive training by DCs (Adoption); the average score during nurse bCAM spot checks was 73.3% (Implementation-Fidelity). After ED-DDP implementation, the odds of delirium screening were 11.5 times higher (95% CI: [6.0, 22.3], p < 0.001), when adjusting for time and site clustering (Penetration);…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 195 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free