Evidence Hub

Medication Adherence in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)

Gonzalez JS, Wen H, Butera NM, Uschner D, Krause-Steinrauf H, Gramzinski MR, Wexler DJ, Petrovitch H et al.

Diabetes care, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Objective: To address previous inconsistencies in reports of differential adherence to diabetes medications, we examined medication adherence and evaluated treatment group differences in a substudy of participants in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE).

Research design and methods: GRADE participants (type 2 diabetes duration 7.5%) glycemic outcomes.

Results: Overall mean ± SD adherence (average of participant-level mean ± SD) was high over 3 years of follow-up at 88.7 ± 10.01, on a scale of 0-100, and decreased slightly by 3 years relative to baseline (-2.0 ± 14.7; P 7.5%) glycemic outcomes (both P < 0.0001). Lower adherence was somewhat more predictive of the secondary outcome for those assigned to glargine or liraglutide, compared with glimepiride or sitagliptin (each P < 0.05). No other comparisons were significant.

Conclusions: Medication adherence was consistently high in GRADE. Observed treatment group differences were small and of unclear clinical significance. Overall, lower adherence robustly predicted worsening glycemic control, highlighting the importance of ongoing assessment.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free