Evidence Hub

Impact of solriamfetol treatment on sleep quality in Chinese patients with OSA-EDS: results of a randomized controlled trial

Fen Wang, Liying Deng, Liang Xie, Jiaomei Jiang, Xiang Li, Wei-Jia Zhang, Hui Ye, Yongmin Ding

Frontiers in Medicine, 2026

357 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction Wake-promoting agents (WPAs), such as solriamfetol, have emerged as effective treatment options for treating excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the impact of solriamfetol on nocturnal sleep quality remains underexplored. This exploratory analysis of a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-arm, phase 3 trial involving Chinese patients with OSA-EDS evaluated the effect of solriamfetol on nocturnal sleep quality. Methods Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive solriamfetol (150 mg) or placebo once daily. The coprimary efficacy endpoints were the changes from baseline to week 12 in mean sleep latency during the Maintenance Wakefulness Test and in Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores. The exploratory endpoints included changes in participants’ polysomnography (PSG) parameters from baseline at Weeks 2, 5, and 12. These parameters were unadjusted and hypothesis-generating. The sleep quality parameters included total sleep time (TST) and wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO). Respiratory parameters included mean oxygen saturation (SaO 2 ), minimum SaO 2 , apnea index, and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Results Of the 357 participants screened, 201 were included in the full analysis set (FAS) (solriamfetol, n = 101; placebo, n = 100). At all-time points (Weeks 2, 5, and 12), no significant changes in TST, WASO, stage N2 sleep, and AHI were observed between the solriamfetol and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 357 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free