Evidence Hub

Effects of inpatient treatment on compulsive exercise in adults with longstanding eating disorders: Secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up

K. Vrabel, S. Bratland-Sanda

International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2023

130 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine changes in compulsive exercise among adults with eating disorders (ED) admitted for inpatient treatment in a randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and compassion-focused therapy (CFT) and whether such changes were influenced by treatment condition, childhood trauma, or level of compulsive exercise.

METHOD

A total of 130 adults admitted to inpatient treatment for EDs mean (SD) age 30.9 (9.7) years, mean illness duration 14.2 (8.9) years, were randomized to receive CBT or CFT and analyzed using multilevel modeling. Assessments included Eating Disorders Examination - Interview, Compulsive Exercise Test and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Mean total CET score at baseline was 14.7 (4.0) with no difference between the treatment groups. A total of 63 (48.5%) had CET score ≥ 15, indicating clinical levels. There was an overall time effect on reduction in CET total and all CET subscale scores except Lack of enjoyment, and CFT provided greater reduction compared to CBT on the CET subscale Mood improvements. Patients with clinical CET score levels showed greater reduction on CET total and the subscales Avoidance, Weight, and Rigidity across time compared to persons with non-clinical CET score. Childhood trauma did not predict changes in CET total or subscale scores.

DISCUSSION

Both CBT and CFT improve overall compulsive exercise. The greater effect of CFT than CBT on exercise as a maladaptive mood regulator…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 130 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free