Evidence Hub

Impact of baseline ECG characteristics on changes in cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic metrices after acute myocardial infarction treated with Empagliflozin

Benedikt M, Aziz F, Fröschl T, Strohhofer C, Kolesnik E, Tripolt N, Pferschy P, Wallner M et al.

Scientific reports, 2024

476 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

The EMMY trial was a multicentre, investigator-initiated, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, which enrolled 476 patients immediately following AMI and the first study demonstrating a significant reduction in NT-proBNP-levels as well as significant improvements in cardiac structure and function in patients after acute myocardial infarction treated with empagliflozin vs. placebo. However, hardly any data are available investigating the prognostic role of baseline electrocardiogram metrics in SGLT2-inhibitor-treated patients. This post-hoc analysis investigated the association of baseline ECG metrics collected in one centre of the trial (181 patients) with changes in structural and functional cardiac parameters as well as cardiac biomarkers in response to Empagliflozin treatment. A total of 181 patients (146 men; mean age 58 ± 14 years) were included. Median PQ-interval was 156 (IQR 144-174) milliseconds (ms), QRS width 92 (84-98) ms, QTc interval 453 (428-478) ms, Q-wave duration 45 (40-60) ms, Q-wave amplitude 0.40 (0.30-0.70) millivolt (mV), and heart rate was 71 (64-85) bpm. For functional cardiac parameters (LVEF and E/e') of the entire cohort, a greater decrease of E/e' from baseline to week 26 was observed in shorter QRS width (P = 0.005).Structural cardiac endpoints were only found to have a significant positive correlation between LVEDD and Q wave duration (P = 0.037). Higher heart rate was significantly correlated with better response in LVEF (P = 0.001), E/e' (P…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 476 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free