Evidence Hub

Magnesium in acute pediatric asthma in the emergency department (MAGICIAN)—A multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial protocol

Schuh S, O'Shea S, Freedman SB, Eltorki M, Gravel J, Ducharme FM, Alqurashi W, Zemek R et al.

PLoS ONE, 2026

192 participants

Abstract

Background: While guidelines recommend intravenous magnesium (IVMg) for refractory pediatric acute asthma, evidence for benefit is scant and disparate. IVMg therapy is resource-intensive and can cause hypotension. To determine if IVMg alters the exacerbation course, it must be given early, and the clinical effect measured at the peak effect of routine co-interventions.

Primary aim: In children with acute asthma remaining in moderate-severe respiratory distress after initial ED therapy, to determine if early IVMg therapy is associated with a significantly greater improvement in respiratory distress at 2 hours after starting IVMg, compared to placebo.

Hypothesis: IVMg will yield significantly greater Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) improvement of ≥1.0 point than placebo.

Study design: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 6 Canadian pediatric EDs of otherwise healthy children 2-17 years old with acute asthma and PRAM ≥5 after initial 1 hour therapy with systemic corticosteroids and 3 inhaled salbutamol ± ipratropium treatments.

Intervention: IVMg sulfate (75 mg/kg, max 2.5 g) or normal saline placebo over 30 minutes.

Primary outcome: PRAM 2 hours post-intervention start. Secondary: PRAM ≤3 at 2 hours; change in PRAM and vital signs over 3 hours; hospitalization; asthma re-visits by 72 hours.

Sample size: With 192 patients, a two-sided test and alpha 0.05 have 80% power to achieve statistical significance if IVMg yields a difference in PRAM…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 192 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free