Evidence Hub

Safe treatment for emergency presentation for suicidal ideation and behavior (SAFE STEPS): Protocol for randomized controlled trial

J. R. Asarnow, David B. Goldston, A. Spirito, B. Keeshin, I. Miller, T. Belin, Naser Ahmadi, Jocelyn I. Meza et al.

Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2026

1,600 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Suicide is currently the second leading cause of death among youth ages 13-24 in the United States. Youths presenting to Emergency Departments (EDs) with suicidal ideation and/or behavior have elevated risk for subsequent suicide attempts and deaths, yet optimal approaches to emergency care remain unclear and too many youths receive inadequate follow-up treatment after discharge.

METHODS

Using a community partnered participatory research model, this multi-site single-blinded randomized comparative effectiveness trial investigates two strategies for enhancing emergency care for 1600 adolescents and young adults (ages 13-24) presenting with suicide attempts and/or suicidal ideation: 1) ED care enhanced by increased access to a developmentally tailored approach to safety planning; and 2) a combined approach that supplements enhanced ED care with brief therapeutic contacts with youths and parents/significant others for 12 months after ED-discharge. These contacts by phone/video/text/letter feature support, brief intervention, and case management. Youths will be recruited from four geographically diverse locations, and assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12-month follow-ups. Parent assessments will be at: baseline; 12-month follow-ups; and when youth report is unavailable. Outcomes will be assessed in two domains: 1) clinical [suicide attempts primary, self-harm (suicide attempts+nonsuicidal self-harm) secondary]; 2) service use (linkage to outpatient mental health care…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,600 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free