Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin and Rapid Kidney Function Decline Incidence in Type 2 Diabetes: An Exploratory Analysis From the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial

Hadjadj S, Cooper ME, Steubl D, Petrini M, Hantel S, Mattheus M, Wanner C, Thomas MC

Kidney medicine, 2024

6,967 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Kidney function progressively declines in most patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Many develop progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), but some experience a more rapid decline, with a greater risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular disease. In EMPA-REG OUTCOME, empagliflozin was associated with slower kidney disease progression. This post hoc analysis evaluated the effect of empagliflozin (pooled doses) on the prevalence of a "rapid decliner" phenotype, defined by an annual estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline of >3 mL/min/1.73 m2.

STUDY DESIGN: This was an exploratory analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME, a large randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults with T2DM, established cardiovascular disease and an eGFR of ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Analysis was undertaken on 6,967 participants (99.2%) in whom serial eGFR data was available.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to empagliflozin 10 mg, 25 mg, or placebo in addition to standard of care.

OUTCOMES: Annual change in eGFR over the maintenance phase of treatment (week 4 to last value on treatment) was calculated using linear regression models. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate differences in rapid decline between the treatment groups.

RESULTS: Over the study period, a rapid decliner phenotype was observed in 188 (9.5%) participants receiving placebo and 134 (3.4%) receiving empagliflozin. After adjusting for other risk…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6,967 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free