Evidence Hub

Validating a novel driving simulation-based MWT against the standard MWT in an OSA-cohort challenged by CPAP-withdrawal (DS-MWT2) – Protocol for a monocentric, controlled, randomized, crossover trial

Veronika Gambin, Nan Li, E. Schwarz, Kristina Keller, Stefan Lakämper

medRxiv, 2026

54 participants

Abstract

Background: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a major yet under-recognized contributor to road traffic accidents. Traditional diagnostic tools, such as the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT), assess wakefulness under passive conditions but may not accurately reflect real-world driving risks. To address this gap, we have piloted a Driving Simulation-based MWT (DS-MWT), designed to evaluate sleepiness in an ecologically valid driving scenario. The present study aims to validate the novel DS-MWT against the classical MWT in a functionally relevant cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).

Methods: The present monocentric, randomized, controlled, within-subject crossover trial will include 54 participants: 36 patients with OSA undergoing ≥ 7-day CPAP withdrawal (W) or continuation (C), and 18 healthy controls. The study employs a well-established CPAP-withdrawal model in patients with prior optimal treatment adherence to transiently induce EDS under controlled conditions. A healthy control group is included to enable between-group comparisons. The primary expected outcome is the difference in mean latencies between MWT and DS-MWT, determined during four standardized test sessions per condition. Secondary exploratory outcomes are defined as the presence, direction, and magnitude of differences or correlations between treatment status (CPAP withdrawal vs. continuation) and driving performance metrics (e.g., lateral position, speed, lane departures, etc.), EEG…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 54 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free