Evidence Hub

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound in detecting clavicle fractures

Haak SL, Vos H, Borgstede MG, Boendermaker AE, Rietveld V, Kroon T, Rosendaal A, Lameijer H et al.

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2025

167 participants

Abstract

STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) can be used as a non-invasive and radiation free adjunct in the triage of patients with clavicle injuries. However, the diagnostic accuracy of PoCUS performed by non-radiologists for this purpose is not yet sufficiently established.

METHODS: A multicentre, prospective cohort study was conducted in 8 emergency departments (EDs) to establish the diagnostic accuracy of PoCUS of the clavicle in patients ≥4 years of age who presented with a clavicle injury. PoCUS was performed by trained emergency physicians, and results were compared with X-ray outcomes (gold standard).

RESULTS: A total of 167 patients were included, of which 127 (76 %) patients had a fracture on X-ray, and 121 (72 %) on PoCUS. PoCUS of the clavicle had a sensitivity of 93 % (95 %CI 87-97 %), a specificity of 93 % (95 %CI 80-98 %), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (95 %CI 0.04-0.14), and a positive likelihood ratio of 12.39 (95 %CI 4.17-36.82) for the presence of a clavicle fracture. Stratified based on age, specificity of PoCUS was lower in children compared to adults, whereas sensitivity was not affected. The agreement between X-ray and PoCUS for fracture displacement was substantial (κ = 0.771).

CONCLUSIONS: PoCUS of the clavicle is a useful adjunct in the triage of patients with clavicle injuries and can help to distinguish which patients need further diagnostic workup.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register, registration code: NL9236.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 167 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free