Evidence Hub

Tailored online eating disorder prevention and health promotion for women: results of a dissemination trial

Nacke B, Görlich D, Beintner I, Vollert B, Schmidt-Hantke J, Taylor CB, Jacobi C

Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025

3,654 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Internet-based interventions are effective in the prevention of eating disorders (EDs) but are rarely translated from controlled study settings into practice. This study aimed to assess short- and long-term outcomes and adherence of a suite of internet-based screening and ED prevention programs.

Methods: In a 5-arm non-randomized dissemination trial, internet-based ED prevention interventions were offered to women recruited from the general population (N = 3,654). Each arm offered a different version of the ED prevention program, tailored for populations at different levels of risk. The interventions comprised 4 to 12 weekly modules based on cognitive-behavioral principles, including psychoeducation, exercises to promote body image and balanced eating, and-if applicable-to reduce ED symptoms. Primary outcome was the change in weight concerns from pre to post, using t-tests and completer data. Secondary outcomes included ED symptoms, eating habits, self-esteem and quality of life.

Results: Pre-post within-subject comparisons in the completer sample showed significant reductions in weight concerns in 4 of 5 study arms (effect sizes between d = -0.45 and d = -0.94). ED symptoms were reduced and the ability to eat intuitively was improved in all study arms, with some effects persisting up to 12 months. Assessment drop-out ranged from 60.6% to 78.1% at post, and between 18.0% and 44.0% of participants completed the whole intervention.

Discussion: The trial…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 3,654 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free