Evidence Hub

Effects of Dog-assisted Therapy in Anxiety Symptoms of Female Adolescents With Eating Disorders: A Controlled Trial

Martínez Núñez B, Fernández Sánchez J, Lavín Pérez AM, Lobato Rincón LL, Fonseca García M, González García I, Graell Berna M, Collado Mateo D

Actas espanolas de psiquiatria, 2025

15 participants

Abstract

Background: Eating disorders are a cluster of challenging psychiatric and medical conditions that constitute a major problem in adolescents and young adults. Animal-assisted interventions are currently a promising complementary therapy with great development in the hospital field.

Methods: The study is a non-randomized clinical trial designed with two groups under assessment. The first group consisted of 15 female patients at a Day Hospital diagnosed with eating disorders who received animal-assisted therapy. The second group had a sample of 15 patients from the same hospital with similar diagnoses and matched characteristics to the intervention group. Anxiety, depression, eating symptoms, grip strength, and health-related quality of life were analyzed both previously and after the intervention.

Results: ANOVA results showed a significant between-group reduction in the state anxiety levels (p = 0.011, ηp2 = 0.211), with a significant decrease in the intervention group (p = 0.003). Interpersonal distrust (p = 0.042) and fear of maturity (p = 0.012) subscales in the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI2) questionnaire had larger improvement when comparing pre- and post-measures in the intervention group. A similar trend was observed for the rest of the eating symptoms subscales and grip strength in the group treated with the animal-assisted intervention.

Conclusion: This study suggests that dog-assisted therapy may be an effective complementary intervention for reducing state…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free