Evidence Hub

Safety and Efficacy of Damoctocog Alfa Pegol in Previously Treated Children Aged 7 to < 12 Years With Severe Haemophilia A in the Phase 3, Open Label Alfa-PROTECT Main Study

Ozelo MC, Luciani M, Glosli H, Kavakli K, Samji N, Makris GC, Tueckmantel C, Maas Enriquez M et al.

European journal of haematology, 2026

35 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background: In the earlier PROTECT VIII Kids study (NCT01775618), damoctocog alfa pegol was efficacious for prevention and treatment of bleeds in children aged < 12 years with severe haemophilia A.

Objective: Assess the safety of damoctocog alfa pegol, including hypersensitivity and loss of efficacy (LoE) due to an immune response to polyethylene glycol, in children aged 7 to < 12 years with severe haemophilia A.

Methods: Alfa-PROTECT is a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, single-arm study (NCT05147662). Primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESI) leading to discontinuation during the first 4 exposure days.

Results: Overall, 35 children enrolled; 32 completed the 6-month study, 21 (60%) reported ≥ 1 AE. Median (range) treatment duration was 182 (172-198) days. All AEs were mild/moderate; 3/35 children (8.6%) had study drug-related AEs. One (2.9%) LoE event was considered an AESI, and led to temporary treatment interruption. No AEs resulted in study drug discontinuation. The probability of < 5% of patients experiencing an AESI was 92.2%. Bleed protection was maintained with damoctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis.

Conclusions: These data confirm the safety profile of damoctocog alfa pegol in children aged 7 to < 12 years with severe haemophilia A. Secondary endpoints indicate treatment was efficacious.

Trial registration: The Alfa-PROTECT trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT05147662).

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 35 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free