Evidence Hub

Effects of Oveporexton, an Orexin Receptor 2-Selective Agonist, on Cognition in Narcolepsy Type 1: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Lammers GJ, Plazzi G, Mignot E, Pizza F, Dauvilliers Y, Barateau L, Maruff P, Scammell TE et al.

JAMA neurology, 2026

161 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Importance: Cognitive symptoms negatively impact people with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). While the effects of orexin receptor 2 (OX2R) agonists have been explored on diagnostic features of the disorder (excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy), effects on cognitive symptoms are not characterized.

Objective: To explore the effects of oveporexton, an oral OX2R-selective agonist, on cognition in people with NT1.

Design, setting, and participants: This is a secondary analysis of the TAK-861-2001 phase 2, 8-week, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, conducted from January 2023 to December 2023, with a 4-week follow-up period. TAK-861-2001 was a multicenter study conducted in clinical settings. Eligible participants were 18 to 70 years of age, with an International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition diagnosis of NT1. Data analysis was performed from July 2024 to July 2025.

Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to twice-daily oral oveporexton or matching placebo, dosed 3 hours apart, in dose groups of 0.5/0.5 mg, 2/2 mg, 2/5 mg, 7 mg/placebo, or placebo/placebo, for 8 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: Cognitive symptoms were assessed using the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) for attention, the Continuous Paired Associate Learning (CPAL) test for memory, and the One Back (ONB) test and International Digit Symbol Substitution Test-symbols (IDSST-s) for executive function.

Results: Of 161 eligible individuals…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 161 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free