Evidence Hub

Efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients recently hospitalized for heart failure: an exploratory prespecified pooled analysis of the DELIVER and EMPEROR-preserved trials

Xue X, Hu M, Chi J, Li J, Zhang W

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026

1,369 participants

Abstract

Background: Hospitalization for heart failure identifies patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) at highest risk. However, precise efficacy estimates for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in this vulnerable subgroup-and whether they depend on the definition of "recent" hospitalization-are lacking.

Methods: This exploratory, hypothesis-generating analysis was a prespecified pooled analysis of the EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER trials in patients with HFpEF (LVEF >40%). High-risk subgroups were defined using data from each trial respectively: HF hospitalization within 30 days ("strict", from DELIVER, n = 654) or 12 months ("broad", from EMPEROR-Preserved, n = 1,369). The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization.

Results: Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of the primary endpoint by 22% in the strict group (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.60-1.03, with a confidence interval that includes the null) and by 27% in the broad group (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59-0.90). There was no significant heterogeneity between these estimates (I² = 0%), and a similar direction of effect was observed across the two trials. The safety profile was consistent with the known class effect.

Conclusion: In patients with HFpEF and a recent HF hospitalization, these exploratory findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors may provide cardiovascular benefit. The similar direction of effect across two definitions of "recent" (≤30 days and ≤12 months)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,369 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free