Evidence Hub

Association of fentanyl use in rapid sequence intubation with post-intubation hypotension

Takahashi J, Goto T, Okamoto H, Hagiwara Y, Watase H, Shiga T, Hasegawa K, Japanese Emergency Medicine Network Investigators

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2018

1,263 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The anesthesia literature has reported that pre-intubation fentanyl use is associated with post-intubation hypotension which is a risk factor of poor post-emergency department (ED) prognosis. However, little is known about the relations between fentanyl use for intubation and post-intubation hypotension in the ED. We aimed to determine whether pretreatment with fentanyl was associated with a higher risk of post-intubation hypotension in the ED.

METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data of ED airway management collected from a multicenter prospective study of 14 Japanese EDs from February 2012 through November 2016. We included all adult non-cardiac-arrest patients who underwent rapid sequence intubation for medical indication. Patients were divided into fentanyl and non-fentanyl groups. The primary outcome was post-intubation hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤90mmHg) in the ED.

RESULTS: Of 1263 eligible patients, 466 (37%) patients underwent pretreatment with fentanyl. The fentanyl group had a higher risk of post-intubation hypotension (17% vs. 6%; unadjusted OR, 1.73; 95%CI, 1.01-2.97; P=0.048) compared to the non-fentanyl group. In the multivariable analysis adjusting for age, sex, weight, principal indication, sedatives, intubator's specialty, number of intubation attempts, and patient clustering within EDs, the fentanyl group had a higher risk of post-intubation hypotension (adjusted OR, 1.87; 95%CI, 1.05-3.34; P=0.03) compared to the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,263 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free