Evidence Hub

Emergency Care Capacity and Accessibility for Non-Communicable Diseases in Kenyan EDs: A Regional Analysis

Ngaruiya C, Tong G, Mowafi H, Hartz L, Mulimba B, Shah M, Rayo J, Nyayieka I et al.

2026

85 participants

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

Background: Emergency Departments (EDs) are crucial to managing non-communicable diseases (NCDs), a leading cause of death, yet there is limited information about the capacity and accessibility of emergency care in Kenya.

Methods: Using data from Project 47, a national dataset on EDs, we conducted a secondary analysis to assess capacity for NCD care, as guided by the WHO Package for Essential NCD Interventions for Primary Care (WHO PEN).

Results: Of the 186 facilities included in the assessment, 45.7% (n=85) had a designated ED. ED capacity, distribution of facilities, number of patients seeking care, and WHO PEN indicators varied by Regional Economic Bloc (REB). Mount Kenya and Aberdares (MKAREB) and Lake Region (LREB) REBs included the greatest number of facilities and served the largest patient catchment areas nationally (8.5 million and 17.8 million, respectively). Key diagnostic tools and treatments were inconsistently available, with ECGs lacking outside of Nairobi (100% of EDs in Nairobi, 14.8% to 33.3% outside of Nairobi, P=0.1021). Oxygen was consistently available in only 44.8% of facilities in FCDC-Pwani, 59.3% in LREB, and 42.9% in NAKAEB, highlighting significant regional gaps, despite the LREB serving a disproportionately larger patient population. Glucometers, similarly, were universally available (100%) in Nairobi, but only available variably in other regional blocs (51.7% to 93.3%, P=0.001474).

Conclusion: Major disparities exist in emergency care…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free