Evidence Hub

Variation in Emergency Department Experience With Pediatric Critical Illness

Joseph AM, Michelson KA, Dewan ML, Lipstein EA, Babcock L, Davis BS, Kahn JM

Annals of emergency medicine, 2026

Abstract

Study objective: We sought to describe variation in emergency department (ED) volume of pediatric critical illness encounters, and to assess the geographic proximity of encounters at low-volume EDs relative to high-volume EDs.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Emergency Department and Inpatient Databases for 5 states from 2018 to 2022. Critical illness was defined as death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or endotracheal intubation in the ED or on hospital day 0 or 1 or ED critical care time billing. We calculated the ED-level incidence of critical illness and dichotomized EDs into low- or high-volume at the 75th percentile of volume for each state and year. We determined how many encounters at low-volume EDs occurred within a 15-minute drive of a high-volume ED.

Results: Of 14,313,896 pediatric ED encounters across 569 EDs, 40,483 (0.3%) were critical. The median ED managed 1,932 pediatric visits each year (interquartile range [IQR] 680 to 5,068) and 5 (IQR 1 to 14) with critical illness. We identified 181 (31.8%) EDs with a calendar year with no pediatric critical illness. We found 1,557 (16.8%) critically ill children were managed in low-volume EDs within a 15-minute drive of a high-volume ED.

Conclusion: Most EDs infrequently care for critically ill children, and a minority of these encounters could be realistically diverted to high-volume EDs. Direct transport to high-volume centers is unlikely to be a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free