Evidence Hub

Associations Between Patient Language Preference and Hepatitis C Screening: Results From the DETECT Hep C Emergency Department Screening Trial

Thiessen M, Haukoos J, Hopkins E, Galbraith J, Rothman RE, Bacon E, Prochazka AV, Jones A et al.

Annals of emergency medicine, 2026

147,498 participants

Abstract

Study objective: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common blood-borne infection in the United States, hence, emergency department (ED)-based HCV screening is effective for diagnosing HCV as an important step leading to referral for treatment. A patient's preferred language other than English (PLOE) may negatively affect overall care, although no prior research has evaluated the effect of language preference on HCV screening in EDs. Thus, the goal of this study was to estimate associations between language preference and HCV testing offer and acceptance as part of routine HCV screening in the ED.

Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of data from the DETECT Hep C Screening Trial, a 3-center, pragmatic randomized clinical trial comparing effectiveness of targeted and nontargeted HCV screening in EDs. To estimate associations between PLOE (versus English) and HCV test offer and acceptance (primary outcomes) while adjusting for potential confounders, risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable modified Poisson regression. Secondary outcomes included HCV test completion and HCV test antibody and RNA test results.

Results: A total of 147,498 patients were randomly assigned (median age: 41 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 29-57; 51.5% male, 42.3% Black, Non-Hispanic; 20.9% Hispanic; 32.2% White, Non-Hispanic; 10.3% PLOE). We observed significant heterogeneity in patient characteristics, outcomes, and estimates across sites. In…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 147,498 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free