Evidence Hub

Assessing Early Efficacy After Initiation of Once-Nightly Sodium Oxybate (ON-SXB; FT218) in Participants with Narcolepsy Type 1 or 2: A Post Hoc Analysis from the Phase 3 REST-ON Trial

Krahn L, Roy A, Winkelman JW, Morse AM, Gudeman J

CNS drugs, 2025

190 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: Once-nightly sodium oxybate (LUMRYZ™; ON-SXB; FT218) significantly improved narcolepsy symptoms in the phase 3 REST-ON trial. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to investigate the early efficacy of ON-SXB at weeks 1 (4.5-g dose) and 2 (6-g dose).

Methods: In REST-ON, participants (≥ 16 years) with narcolepsy type 1 or 2 were randomized 1:1 to ON-SXB (4.5 g, 1 week; 6 g, 2 weeks; 7.5 g, 5 weeks; 9 g, 5 weeks) or placebo. Protocol-prespecified efficacy assessments were conducted at weeks 3 (6-g dose), 8 (7.5-g dose), and 13 (9-g dose). A post hoc analysis was conducted to assess the early efficacy of ON-SXB, defined as efficacy at weeks 1 (4.5-g dose) and 2 (6-g dose) on Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score, visual analog scale (VAS) sleep quality, and VAS refreshing nature of sleep. Least squares mean differences (LSMD) in change from baseline to weeks 1 and 2, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and P values were calculated using mixed-effects models for repeated measures.

Results: In the modified intent-to-treat population (n = 190; ON-SXB, n = 97; placebo, n = 93), baseline ESS scores were 16.6 and 17.5, sleep quality scores were 53.8 and 55.9, and refreshing nature of sleep scores were 46.5 and 49.9 with ON-SXB and placebo, respectively. At week 1 (4.5 g), numerical improvement in ESS score (LSMD [95% CI], - 0.7 [- 1.6 to 0.2]) and significant improvements in sleep quality (3.6 [1.1-6.1]; P < 0.01) and refreshing nature of sleep (3.2 [0.5-5.9]; P < 0.05)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 190 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free