Evidence Hub

Social Disparity and Treatment-Seeking in Eating Disorders During Childhood and Adolescence: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Hesse Krenchel EC, Joensen A, Olsen EM, Bould H, Hughes AM, Ekstrøm CT, Strandberg-Larsen K

JAACAP open, 2026

523,148 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objective: Advantaged socioeconomic circumstances are linked to a higher risk of diagnosed eating disorders (EDs). However, evidence on non-diagnosed cases, that is, individuals reporting ED symptoms without formal diagnosis, remains limited, suggesting detection and treatment-seeking barriers. In this study, we assessed associations between socioeconomic circumstances and clinically diagnosed and non-diagnosed EDs in childhood and adolescence.

Method: This study used data from the Danish National Birth Cohort, linking registry-based diagnosed EDs (participant ages 6-18 years) with self-reported ED symptoms at age 18 years. Data included 523,148 individuals born in Denmark between 1996 and 2003, with 44,552 providing information on self-reported ED symptoms used to classify non-diagnosed EDs. Socioeconomic indicators, including parental education and household income at age 6 years, were analyzed using quasi-Poisson and multinomial logistic regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and relative risk ratios (RRRs).

Results: Diagnosed EDs were more common among individuals with higher parental education, following a stepwise pattern. Compared to short education (∼12 years), long education (∼17-20 years) was associated with higher risk (IRR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.21-1.52), whereas basic education (∼10 years) was linked to lower risk (IRR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.59-0.83). The pattern reversed for non-diagnosed EDs, with individuals whose parents had basic education showing a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 523,148 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free