Evidence Hub

Non-traumatic chief complaints in older patients in European emergency departments and associated outcomes during the Covid-19 pandemic - a secondary analysis of the cross sectional EGERS study

Riedlinger D, Karamercan MA, Dündar ZD, Janssens K, Adam VN, Bjørnsen LP, Fabbri A, Laribi S et al.

BMC geriatrics, 2026

2,794 participants

Abstract

Background: The scope of medical conditions addressed in Emergency Departments (ED) increases with growing numbers of older patients among the ED patient population. More information on their chief complaints and related treatment outcomes is essential to ensure high-quality ED care. The objective of this study was to describe the pattern of chief complaints of older ED patients and evaluate the associations between these complaints and outcomes such as mortality and hospital admission.

Methods: This secondary analysis is based on the observational 'Epidemiology of Geriatric patients in Europe' (EGERS) study. This prospective, routine data cross-sectional study was conducted in 36 EDs across 9 European countries. Data collection from routine clinical records of all patients aged 65 and older over a 7-day period from October 19 to November 30, 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic. Patients with one documented non-traumatic chief complaint were analyzed. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and general linear mixed models were used to assess factors associated with hospital admission and in-hospital mortality. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.

Results: The study population consisted of 2,794 patients with one specified chief complaint. The mean age was 77.4 (± 8.2) years. The most frequent chief complaints were shortness of breath, abdominal pain, chest pain, weakness and fatigue, and extremity pain and numbness, representing 59% of the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,794 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free