Evidence Hub

A Host-Protein Test for Differentiating Bacterial From Viral Infection: Diagnostic Accuracy in Elderly Patients

Gottlieb TM, Orr Y, Hamami H, Navon R, Kellerman L, Eden E, Haber D, Petersiel N et al.

Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025

111 participants

Abstract

Objectives: Older adults are vulnerable to infection and are difficult to diagnose. This study assessed the performance of MeMed BV (MMBV), a host-protein test for differentiating bacterial from viral infection, in adults ≥65 years.

Methods: Post hoc pooled and meta-analysis of adults with suspected acute infections enrolled in 3 prospective studies. MMBV results were interpreted as bacterial/viral/equivocal per manufacturer's instructions. Reference standard infection etiology was adjudicated by experienced physicians who were blinded to MMBV. Diagnostic accuracy for bacterial infection was calculated for MMBV results (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], bin analysis) and for unequivocal MMBV results (sensitivity/specificity). MMBV's potential impact on antibiotic use was estimated by comparing MMBV-guided decisions to actual practice.

Results: A total of 754 younger (18-64 years) and 248 older (≥65 years) adults were included. Among older adults, the median age was 75.0 years (IQR, 69.0, 82.0), 53.2% were male, 68.1% were hospitalized, and 79.0% had ≥3 comorbidities. Respiratory tract infections were common (76.2%), and 85.1% were prescribed antibiotics. A total of 111 patients were assigned a bacterial reference standard infection etiology, 77 a viral etiology, and 60 an indeterminate etiology. In pooled analysis, MMBV attained comparable AUC in older (0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98) vs younger adults (0.95; 0.93-0.97). Focusing on older adults, 96.2%…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free