Evidence Hub

Suicidal ideation at psychiatric emergency presentation predicts trajectories of functional disability and symptom burden in mood and anxiety disorders: A prospective cohort study

Bahremand A, Maheu S, Miniaoui M, Stip E, Cailhol L, Pinard GF, Do A, Consortium S et al.

Journal of affective disorders, 2026

261 participants

Abstract

Suicidal ideation (SI) is common among patients presenting to psychiatric emergency departments (EDs), yet its association with longer-term clinical and functional outcomes remains insufficiently understood. This study examined trajectories of functional disability, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and alcohol misuse among patients with mood and anxiety disorders according to SI status at ED presentation. Data were drawn from a prospective cohort of 261 adults with mood and anxiety disorders presenting to a psychiatric ED and followed for 12 months. Linear mixed-effects models examined longitudinal outcomes according to baseline SI status, adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors. A secondary analysis examined longitudinal associations between time-varying SI and depressive symptoms. Baseline SI was associated with greater functional disability and more severe depressive and anxiety symptoms throughout follow-up period, but not with alcohol misuse. Time-by-SI interactions were nonsignificant for all outcomes, indicating similar trajectories regardless of baseline SI. Depressive and anxiety symptoms improved over follow-up, whereas functional disability increased at discharge before stabilizing, and alcohol misuse decreased only at 12 months. Poor sleep satisfaction, chronic physical illness, and higher impulsivity were associated with poorer outcomes. Male sex and religious or spiritual coping were associated with lower functional disability and/or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 261 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free