Evidence Hub

Primary and secondary data in emergency medicine health services research – a comparative analysis in a regional research network on multimorbid patients

Anna Schneider, Andreas Wagenknecht, Hanna Sydow, Dorothee Riedlinger, F. Holzinger, A. Figura, J. Deutschbein, T. Reinhold et al.

BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2023

9,329 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

Background This analysis addresses the characteristics of two emergency department (ED) patient populations defined by three model diseases (hip fractures, respiratory, and cardiac symptoms) making use of survey (primary) and routine (secondary) data from hospital information systems (HIS). Our aims were to identify potential systematic inconsistencies between both data samples and implications of their use for future ED-based health services research. Methods The research network EMANET prospectively collected primary data ( n =1442) from 2017-2019 and routine data from 2016 ( n =9329) of eight EDs in a major German city. Patient populations were characterized using socio-structural (age, gender) and health- and care-related variables (triage, transport to ED, case and discharge type, multi-morbidity). Statistical comparisons between descriptive results of primary and secondary data samples for each variable were conducted using binomial test, chi-square goodness-of-fit test, or one-sample t-test according to scale level. Results Differences in distributions of patient characteristics were found in nearly all variables in all three disease populations, especially with regard to transport to ED, discharge type and prevalence of multi-morbidity. Recruitment conditions (e.g., patient non-response), project-specific inclusion criteria (e.g., age and case type restrictions) as well as documentation routines and practices of data production (e.g., coding of diagnoses) affected…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free